The options that a runner tends to make in what athletic shoes to run in can be quite crucial. Getting the athletic shoes correct has implications for how quickly the athlete runs and might alter the risk for a running injury. You can find, however, people who do disagree with this and there is certainly plenty of controversy about the topic. There exists some facts to support both position of this debate, but not a great deal of agreement and it depends upon the way you prefer to spin the research in respect of which side of the debate you want to believe in. The podiatry relevant live talk via Facebook, PodChatLive a short while ago reviewed this topic by chatting with Dr Chris Napier, Physiotherapist and Associate Professor from the University of British Columbia (and 2:33 marathon runner). PodChatLive is a weekly chat which goes out live on Facebook and after that published to YouTube at the end of the livestream.
In this chat on athletic shoes, Chris talked about his latest British Journal of Sports Medicine article that was around the logical misconceptions in the running shoe argument. The PodChatLive hosts and Chris spoke of just how runners (both uninjured and also injured) should select running shoes. They described precisely what the research really does actually informs us along with what it doesn’t yet show us. Additionally they outlined just how much focus and attention athletic shoes appears to receive and questioned, is it basically all about comfort? Chris Napier is a Clinical Assistant Professor within the Department of Physical Therapy at the University of British Columbia as well as an associate member of the Centre for Hip Health and Mobility. Chris Napier first received his Master of Physiotherapy education in Perth in Australia, in 2003, and then his PhD at the University of British Columbia in 2018 about running biomechanics and injury. Since becoming a physiotherapist, he has specialized his training with postgrad studies in manual therapy as well as sport physical therapy.